Often
times users of power
systems have an unclear
notions regarding the
configurations of power
systems that provide
features of redundancy,
paralleling and the
new notion of multiple
source Fault Tolerant
Power Supplies (FTPS).
As a result, customers
may specify a configuration
that is beyond what
is needed or intended,
and hence increase the
complexity and cost
of the system. This
article is the first
segment in a series
of 3 articles intended
to cover all aspects
of this topic from a
user oriented point
of view.
The
general idea of fault
tolerancy is to avert
down time of the host
system due to a failure
of the power system.
The cost of down time
is nowadays too high
and too complex to quantify,
and it seems that no
more justification is
needed for the extra
expense that redundancy
imposes. Instead, fault
tolerancy became a standard
feature in the most
telecom power systems,
and information technology
systems especially internet
hosting setups.
REDUNDANT
POWER SYSTEMS
The notion of constructing
a fault tolerant power
system from 2 or more
paralleled power modules
(PM), be it SMPS or
DC-DC converters, targeted
to provide redundant
operation, is often
mentioned as (N+1) configuration.
(N+1)
Redundancy requires
that a failure of any
one (PM) in the power
system, will not diminish
the system’s ability
of supplying full load
performance to the host
system. Accordingly,
if the Redundant Power
System (RPS) is made
of 2 or more paralleled
power modules, if one
of these units fails,
the other(s) must provide
the host system adequate
capability to perform
to its fullest extent
without any degradation.
Further, the failure
of a PM should not cause
any disturbance in the
DC bus beyond what can
be tolerated. Therefore,
unless notified (by
an electronic signal)
that one PM has failed,
the host system will
not detect the event.
However,
it is almost impossible
that when one PM in
a redundant system abruptly
fails , the common DC
bus outputs will be
free of any disturbance,
or “glitch”
as it is commonly referred
to in the power supply
lingo. A momentary drop
or increase in the DC
bus must be small enough
and very quick so as
not to upset the host
system’s performance.
Figure
1 shows a (1+1) PM power
system in redundancy.
In this case the host
system (i.e. the load)
needs 1200W for full
operation, and the chosen
configuration is a made
of two the1200W power
supplies in parallel.
Each one of these modules
should be fully adequate
to provide 1200W to
the host system. Therefore
any one-module failure
will
leave
the host system fully
energized by the remaining
module. If the host
system requires 2400W,
then the power system
will require a third
PM to be added in parallel
for a setup of (2+1).
Any 2 modules can supply
the load needed.
|